Receiving Context in Narrative Practice: Why Stories Need Audiences to Last

When we speak about practice, we often focus on the techniques that happen inside the room: the questions asked, the metaphors used, the way stories are untangled and re-told. But what happens after the conversation? How do the newly shaped stories of identity survive once the session is over and the client walks back into the world, surrounded by the same people, pressures, and problem-saturated narratives that brought them to coaching, counselling or therapy in the first place?

Narrative practice has created in interesting concept to help with this:  the idea of receiving context becomes essential.

What Is a Receiving Context?

The term comes from narrative practice and was elaborated by Jim Duvall and Laura Béres in their book Innovations in Narrative Practice (2011). It refers to the social and relational environment that “receives” a client’s new, preferred story of themselves.

The metaphor used is that of a three-act play:

1. Act I introduces the old, problem-saturated story.

2. Act II witnesses the emergence of new, preferred storylines through re-authoring conversations.

3. Act III requires a receiving context — a community of witnesses, practices, and relationships that can hold the new story so that it is not swallowed back into silence.

Without this third act, the narrative risks collapse. A story told once, in isolation, is vulnerable. A story told in community, and honored by others, is far more resilient.

Why Receiving Context Matters

Think about how fragile change can feel. A client leaves a powerful session with new insights, perhaps even a new self-understanding. Yet the moment they return home, old habits, old stories about themselves, and expectations of people in “normal life” begin to whisper: “This is not who you are. Don’t get above yourself. Nothing has really changed.”

In this way, the old story tries to reassert itself.

A beneficial receiving context protects against this pull. It is a deliberate effort to create audiences and relationships that validate and sustain the emerging identity. When others hear, reflect back, and affirm the preferred story, it takes root more deeply. The client no longer carries it alone.

Michael White and David Epston (1990), the founders of narrative practice, hinted at this dynamic in their early work. Duvall and Béres (2011) make it explicit: the practitioner’s role is not just to help people tell new stories, but to ensure those stories have places to live.

How Receiving Context Is Built

Creating a receiving context is not accidental. Narrative therapists engage in specific practices to broaden the audience for preferred stories:

• Revisiting the backstory. Clients and therapists return to earlier events, re-membering conversations, and significant figures who can be recruited into the new narrative.

• Outsider witnesses. People who are not part of the immediate environment but who can respectfully hear the story and reflect on how it resonates with their own lives.

• Therapeutic documents. Letters, certificates, or transcripts that carry the story beyond the practice room.

• Community involvement. Inviting trusted friends, mentors, or support groups to witness and sustain the identity changes.

Each of these methods works to reduce isolation, which is one of the greatest risks to sustaining change. Alone, clients may doubt their new story. In company, they hear it echoed back and strengthened.

Receiving Context and Identity

Narrative practice is grounded in the belief that identity is shaped through stories told and received in relationships. If no one hears the new story, it struggles to become part of lived identity.

Receiving context provides a future-oriented frame. Clients begin to imagine themselves moving forward with a re-incorporated identity, populated by supportive audiences. Their life is not just “free of the problem” but is actively filled with practices, values, and communities that reflect who they want to be.

It is, in other words, the difference between a fragile seedling and a well-tended garden.

An Illustration

Consider a teenager who has been entangled in stories of failure: “lazy,” “unmotivated,” “not college material.” Through narrative conversations, they begin to recall times when they showed determination — staying up all night to finish a creative project, teaching themself a difficult piece of music, persisting in sports despite setbacks.

In the practice room, a new story emerges: they are persistent, creative, and capable of self-directed learning.

But if this story is not received beyond the session, it risks fading. When they return to school, teachers may continue to label them “unmotivated.” At home, parents may only notice their unfinished chores. The old narrative waits to reclaim them.

To build a receiving context, the practitioner might:

• Invite parents to witness their accounts of persistence.

• Write them a letter that documents their creativity.

• Connect them with a mentor who values independent learners.

• Encourage them to share their story with a friend who has faced similar doubts.

Each step recruits more listeners, strengthening the preferred identity. Over time, the receiving context makes “relapse” into the problem story less likely.

Receiving Context Beyond Practice

While the concept arises in therapeutic practice, it resonates with coaching, leadership, and community development as well. Any time people take steps toward change, they need environments that support and echo those steps.

• In coaching, clients may design actions between sessions. If they report back to peers or colleagues who validate their progress, the new identity gains traction.

• In leadership development, a receiving context might be a team that notices and acknowledges new patterns of leadership, rather than holding the leader hostage to their old reputation.

• In community change, initiatives thrive when stories of success are heard, celebrated, and circulated widely.

The principle is universal: stories live or die in the contexts that receive them.

The Risk Without Receiving Context

What happens when a receiving context is missing? Clients may experience initial breakthroughs but later feel frustrated, as if change cannot stick. They may blame themselves: “I guess I wasn’t strong enough. Maybe the practice didn’t work.”

Narrative practice offers a different perspective: it is not simply about willpower or insight. Change requires scaffolding — relational supports that protect and nurture the new story until it is fully lived. Without this, even the strongest insight can be eroded by old cultural narratives.

Conclusion

The idea of receiving context challenges us to see practice as more than conversation. It is about creating social scaffolding for identity change. Stories do not survive in isolation; they require audiences, documents, communities, and relationships that echo them into being.

In the three-act play of narrative practice, receiving context is Act III — the place where the new story takes the stage and finds an audience ready to applaud. It ensures that clients are not left alone with their fragile seedlings of change but are supported by a garden of relationships that help those seedlings grow strong.

For therapists, coaches, and leaders alike, the question becomes: What receiving contexts are we helping to build? If we want stories of resilience, creativity, and hope to last, they must be heard, witnessed, and carried forward by others. That is how narrative practice sustains transformation — by ensuring that the story has a home.

Reference:

Duvall, J., & Béres, L. (2011). Innovations in narrative therapy: Connecting practice, training, and research. W. W. Norton.

If you want to talk about or strengthen a part of your coaching identity with a bunch of cool people, why not join one of our free coaching meetups and exchanges?

‍