Recently, I read a post of a coaching acquaintance on LinkedIn. She was re-sharing someone who was warning against vaccination as in their world-view it causes autism. The rationale that was given was that vaccines contain mercury – the post also warned against Covid-19 vaccinations. I quickly found the relevant information on Snopes and without thinking much about it I posted it beneath: no, scientifically speaking, vaccines have not shown to be linked to autism and “mercury” and mercury salts do not have the same toxicity (as far as I know). You cannot believe the ensuing nightmare of accusations and abuse I faced after this post. Being accused of acting as a “paid troll” by the CIA (or something) was one of the most harmless replies. Threats, belittling, attacks on my person – as much as I tried to stay calm and rational, a discussion was very difficult.
This sent me down a research rabbit-hole trying to find out what on earth can be done to further constructive conversations in these situations and I am still in the middle of said hole, but I thought I’d share my preliminary findings. You might find them useful when you are in similar situations or even when you are talking to people at work who hold very different viewpoints from you.
Try the “Angry Uncle Bot”
Karen Tamerius, a psychiatrist and founder of “Smart Politics” has researched how to have constructive discussions across political divides. In a nutshell, she advises to:
In my above example, I should have asked about what my colleague was worried about (health of her children, presumably), asked how her children were doing (maybe), agreed that children’s health is very important and then shared my experience of having mumps in my childhood or my experience in high-school chemistry with sodium in metal form burning on water and sodium in salt which we consume daily (or something).
Read about Loretta Ross
I was able to interview Loretta Ross for the ICF Germany podcast on her concept of “calling in” instead of “calling out”. The podcast is published on January 8, 2021 at Coachfederation.de/podcast. She advocates “calling people in” instead of “calling them out” on their mistakes. “Calling in” happens with love instead of with anger. She recommends:
One of the prerequisites here is not to assume the worst in people, but assume that they have good intentions but might not be educated enough about what offends others.
In my above case I should have thought about the people in this discussion MUCH more before simply (and arrogantly) posting a Snopes reference. I should have talked to the person privately, not publicly, at first and should have connected with my willingness to have a real conversation.
That all does not mean that we should not state our views online – I think, though, that if we are open and collaborative, we might contribute more.
I will stay on this topic for a bit — currently reading about people who helped others out of cults and hostage negotiators, finding out what I can learn there. When I’m done, I’ll let you know.
Do get in contact if you have anything that you would like to share or join one of our free meetups.
The rich text element allows you to create and format headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, images, and video all in one place instead of having to add and format them individually. Just double-click and easily create content.
A rich text element can be used with static or dynamic content. For static content, just drop it into any page and begin editing. For dynamic content, add a rich text field to any collection and then connect a rich text element to that field in the settings panel. Voila!
Headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, figures, images, and figure captions can all be styled after a class is added to the rich text element using the "When inside of" nested selector system.